The VeriSign Security Review - January 2006 from VeriSign, Inc.

The VeriSign Security Review

January 2006

Hackers relentlessly exploited several critical Microsoft vulnerabilities and launched another zero-day attack. A busy month for phishers as new scams target the navy and air force community. And two years after the first enterprise SOX compliance efforts, the court system is having its say on SOX.

Welcome to 2006! Eyes Open.

In this issue:

Hot Topics

Standards and Regulations

News from VeriSign

Ask a VeriSign Consultant

Security Events

Hot Topics

Zero-Day Attack Prompts Microsoft Patch

In the latest zero-day attack, malicious code targeted at the Microsoft .WMF vulnerability (MS06-001) hit the wild before the security community knew about it, causing a massive chain reaction of snort signature development, debates over next steps, independent patching, and, finally, Microsoft’s official patch release two weeks after the attack.

The attack targets a graphics rendering engine vulnerability in Windows 2000, Windows XP, and Windows Server 2003. Approximately 1000 Web sites were affected. Separate attacks were launched via Instant Messaging and email spam.

VeriSign iDefense Security Intelligence Service has upgraded threat levels to 3 (Elevated) and 4 (High) at the height of the crisis. The user community was pleased when Microsoft decided to release an unscheduled patch to stop this threat from spreading more widely. The VeriSign rating has since returned to 2 (Guarded).

Back to Top

December Threat Summary

November’s infamous Sober outbreak threatened to resume after January 6th, but has so far been dormant. VeriSign iDefense Security Intelligence Service has more details, and VeriSign continues to monitor URLs generated and probed by Sober-infected systems.

Multiple vulnerabilities were identified in the Linux kernel, which could be exploited by remote or local attackers to cause a denial of service. Fixes are available through upgrading to Linux Kernel 2.6.15.1, http://www.kernel.org/

A public exploit targeted at the Veritas NetBackup Volume Manager Daemon (vmd) vulnerability is available. An attacker could send a packet to Volume Manager and launch a denial-of-service attack remotely. Symantec has issued a support advisory.

Apple QuickTime, widely deployed in Windows and Mac systems as well on the popular iPods, has five critical flaws all to do with image handling. These flaws have the potential for arbitrary code execution or buffer over flow, and they affect QTIF, TIFF, and GIF images. Apple has provided a patch for all five flaws.

The BlackBerry Enterprise Server may be vulnerable to denial-of-service attacks, according to a group of German hackers. An attacker could launch a DoS attack by sending “specially crafted” packets to the router, according to a vulnerability note posted on the U.S. Computer Emergency Readiness Team’s Web site. The result could be disrupted communications between the BlackBerry Enterprise Server and BlackBerry devices. BlackBerry has developed a fix for the reported vulnerability.

Windows Wi−Fi Flaw Detailed

Hackers have exposed details of a previously undocumented flaw in Microsoft's handling of Wi−Fi which affects users of Windows 2000 and XP. A security researcher explained that the issue centers on the way in which the operating systems look for wireless networks during startup. When a Wi−Fi equipped laptop starts up using Windows 2000 or XP it immediately starts scanning for wireless networks. If none is found it sets up an ad hoc link using the name of the last wireless network accessed. If a hacker was aware of the last used network ID, it could be used to establish a direct local link with the Windows PC offering access to all local drives. However, the problem only arises if the target machine is not running a firewall. One of the changes in Windows XP SP2 turns the built-in firewall on by default. For more information, visit http://www.vnunet.com/vnunet/news/2148609/microsoft−wi−flaw− found

Back to Top

New Phishing Scams

Several new phishing scams emerged in the last month, one preying on sympathizers of recent mining accident, and two others targeting U.S. Navy and Air Force personnel.

The US Federal Bureau of Investigations (FBI) issued a warning on Jan. 11, 2006, alerting Internet users of a new phishing e-mail requesting financial aid for Randy McCloy Jr., the sole survivor of the

West Virginia mine explosion that killed 12 men. The e-mail appears as though it is from a doctor treating the survivor. The doctor reportedly describes the McCloy’s condition and discusses the funds needed for a full recovery. Internet users who receive any such e-mails are asked to file a complaint with the Internet Crime Complaint Center.

In addition, naval seamen who use the Navy Knowledge Online (NKO) Web portal and Air Force personnel with access to the Air Force Portal are also exposed to phishing emails leading them to fictitious Websites. Users are urged to double check the Website address and to change their portal password if they believe they have fallen victim to the scams.

Back to Top

Standards and Regulations

Court Excludes Foreign SOX Whistleblower

The Sarbanes-Oxley whistleblower protections do not extend to foreigners working in overseas subsidiaries of American firms, a US appeals court has ruled. The ruling involved an Argentinean who worked for Brazilian subsidiaries of Boston Scientific, who complained of being fired for reporting revenue over-statements by the subsidiaries. The ruling did not address the status of American citizens working overseas for foreign subsidiaries, or foreigners working directly for public US companies. Learn more from the IT Compliance Institute.

Back to Top

California’s New Anti-phishing Law In Effect

California legislation that took effect this month includes a new law intended to protect consumers against phishing. Senate Bill 355 makes Internet phishing a crime in California.

Phishing is the practice of using e−mail to entice recipients to divulge personal information, such as Social Security numbers or credit card numbers, in order to commit fraud.

Back to Top

News from VeriSign

VeriSign Hosts Panel Discussion on FFIEC Compliance

VeriSign continues to host discussions on helping financial institutions comply with the FFIEC guidance for online banking. The latest will be a breakfast panel on January 26th in New York. Among the panelists are Jonathan Penn, Principal Analyst from Forrester Research, Robert D. Lee, Senior Technology Specialist from the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, and Michael Aisenberg, Director of Policy at VeriSign. The panel will discuss proven approaches of create a safe online banking environment, including strategies for federated identity and token sharing. For more information, see recordings of the last panel discussion.

Back to Top

VeriSign to Report Financial Results

VeriSign will announce fourth quarter financials on January 26th after the close of U.S. financial markets.

There will be a live teleconference call on January 26th at 2:00 pm (PT) accessible at (800) 210-9006 (US) or (719) 457-2621 (international).  A listen-only live web cast of the Q4 earnings conference call will also be available at www.verisign.com or www.streetevents.com.  A replay of this call will be available at (888) 203-1112 (passcode: 4947853) or (719) 457-0820 (passcode: 4947853 – international) beginning at 5:00 pm (PT) on January 26th and will run through February 3rd.

Back to Top

Ask a VeriSign Consultant

Each month, our highly experienced security consultants share their expertise in an area of your concern. This month, senior product manager Doug Barbin discusses log monitoring. Send your questions to askverisignsecurity@verisign.com.

Q: Monitoring server logs is so much processing power, storage, and my staff's time. What do I need to know to monitor logs effectively?

A: You're not alone - logging is a pain.  Every day it seems like there is more and more data you to assemble, parse, and analyze.  The good news is that good logging practice not only helps with your compliance efforts, but it is good for security.  More specifically, if you ever have to do some sort of incident investigation, there is no better source of data than the logs from the individual hosts.

The following are examples of things you need to know:

What to collect?  You can collect as much as you want.  The better answer is critical servers, network devices, and other hosts.  Pay specific attention to the regulatory requirements with which you need to comply.  For instance, with Sarbanes-Oxley (SOX), you’ll want to monitor all systems that process financial data as well as the surrounding network routers, switches, etc. that support and protect them.  For PCI, your concern is those systems processing credit card data, for HIPAA, patient health data, etc.  There is a perception out there that there are certain types of bad things that you want to pay attention to based on the regulation.  That’s not true.  You want to monitor as much as possible on those systems that may have regulated or protected data.  How much do I need to collect and keep?  This isn’t as easy as it sounds.  SOX wants you to keep audit records for a year, PCI about the same, but none of them really specify in what format or how quickly you need to have access to it.  On top of complying with the latest regulations, you may still need to store data longer for Intellectual Property requirements, SEC regulations, or NASD regulations. Check with your legal counsel. How often do I need to review the logs?  There are three dependencies here that drive the frequency of reporting.  1) The more critical the system, the higher the frequency of manual review of summary reports.  2) The volume of the logs will also drive the frequency.  If there is too much data to reasonably perform the review weekly then daily may be required.  3) If you have custom signatures set up to notify or alert you to significant events, then you won’t be required to perform spot reviews as frequently.  Most of VeriSign’s Host Log Monitoring customers review reports that are generated on a weekly basis.  In addition, many of them have rules set up so that if a high-severity event is logged against a high-criticality system, or if a series of events have occurred, they will be notified by our Security Operations Center. What do I look for?  In general you are looking for irregularities.  Examples may include a user accessing a sensitive system that they either don’t have access to or don’t often access it.  It could also include the creation or deletion of accounts and/or the elevation of a particular user’s privileges.  Failed logon attempts are always of interest.  Monitoring logs is demanding on processes, storage, and human attention. A lot of processes can be automated; storage will continue to be more cost-efficient; an outsourcing it can save you human resources.  In evaluating potential solutions, look to see which ones really do actually save you time and money allowing your analysts to focus on investigating real threats to the organization and its critical assets.

Doug Barbin is a senior product manager at VeriSign.  He manages VeriSign’s Host Log Monitoring offering.

Back to Top

Security Events

January 30-31, 2006 
Net-ID 2006 
Berlin, Germany

February 6-8, 2006 
Demo06 
Phoenix, AZ

February 13-17, 2006 
RSA Conference 2006 
San Jose, CA

February 22-23, 2006 
Unified Compliance Summit 
Las Vegas, NV

Back to Top


Related Products & Services
Related Solutions


Contact Us
Please contact sales at
650-426-5310 or
submit your inquiry online.
White Papers